requestId:684aed7b9e27e3.43307114.
Analysis of the “Physical Competition”: A Comparison of the Changes between Serious Resume and Oriental Masters
Author: Wu Zhanliang
Source: Author Authorized by Confucian Network Published
Original from the 56th issue of “Taiwan Literature, History and Philosophy” (Baoqing Station Director2002, Taipei)
Time: Confucius was the 6th day of the eighth month of Dingyou in the 2568th year of the year of Dingyou in the 25th and 68th year of the year of Dingyou in the 2017th year of the 2017th year
[Abstract]
The social thinking in the middle has had a great impact on modern China. This kind of social thinking integrates the relevant opinions of Oriental masters such as Darwin, Sphere, Huxley, etc., and participates in critical reviews and comments. The landscape is complex, the content is profound and includes a variety of opposite opinions, so it is difficult to clarify. This article carefully analyzes the social transformation thinking in the middle from the perspective of “focus on the competition” in terms of “focus on the competition” in order to make it clearer about the differences between the principles and interpretations of “focus on the competition” concept, as well as the methods of strictly converting and integrating Eastern academic speech.
【Keywords】
Seriously, Darwin, Sphere, Huxley, Ramack, competition, natural habits, competition, natural selection, direct adaptation, and efficiency transmission
Seriously went to the UK to study in the late 19th century (1877-1879), and then returned to Tianjin to teach. During this period, he received the evolutionary theory, the most important world and social thinking of the Victorian era, [1], and was eventually affected. Based on the theory of evolution, he integrated the traditional Chinese world view, and established a large philosophical system, called himself the “Tianyan Zong Philosopher”. [2] To be clear and serious, we must explore his thinking system in the middle of the evolution. The serious social and biological evolution thinking is the middle of “the competition of things” and touches and confronts the arguments of this at that time. There are many studies on the academic world about the serious daily competition, social evolution and thinking about oneself, and the landscape of the times. [3] But to this dayIt has not been able to fully clarify the various differences and changes that are exposed to here, and the mismatch between them and the reversal itself. [4] This article will take a different approach and carefully analyze the various transformation concepts touched by the social evolution concept in the middle from the perspective of comparing Chinese and Western thinking, in order to make it clearer about the connotation and characteristics of this study, the differences in the original meaning and interpretation of the concept of “counter-competence” and the methods of strictly converting Eastern academic speech. The layers that these topics are exposed to are very broad, and this article cannot handle them as much as possible. It can only focus on the perspective of comparing the evolutionary perspectives of the Oriental Masters at that time. As for other aspects, it will be in the coming days.
Seriously translated the phrase “competition for daily competition” Although it comes from Charles Darwin’s “struggle for existence” and “natural selection”, its meaning is different from the original meaning of Darwin. The carefully translated “The Discourse of Heaven”, “Tenets of the Group” and other works not only introduce Darwin’s competitive and natural filtering statements, but also participated in the views of Herbert Spencer and Thomas Huxley, and their evolutionary thinking and their implications for competitive and natural filtering are different from Darwin. On this basis, he used “Features Competition” to combine the academic thoughts of Darwin, Sphere and Huxley, as well as his own explanations of their learning. The content is very complicated and includes multiple opposing opinions, so it is difficult to analyze buy online car and horse tax. In the field of Darwinism in the study of historical Darwinism, the Darwinism, the Neo-Darwinism (reform Darwinism), the social Darwinism, the Sphere, the Lamarckism and the Neo-Lamackism were already in chaos. [5] Now we have participated in the “Chinese Darwenism” to make the problem even more complicated. [6] We must carefully revise the discussions of the aforementioned major Eastern teachers in order to deeply understand the characteristics of re-evolution thinking.
Natural filtering or dependence on each other
Seriously when he introduced “The Legend of the Heavens” (the original book is Evolution and Ethics by Huxley), he suffered first, and at the same time his most concerned issue was his own meaning of transformationalism for human society. HeXuley, Spenser and Darwin have different opinions on this problem, and the focus of their arguments is: is the focus mechanism that social development relies on or should follow, and is it natural filtering or mutual dependence? The “Everything Competition” of social thinking is also carried out along this discussion. But before discussing the meaning of the evolutionary discussion on human society, we must first go back to the Dal literature that explains the evolution of biology (rather than social 官网彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩
The evolution has a very traditional source of truth in the East and the East, but the scientific evolution theory is importantly found in the East in the 19th century. Before Darwin, many biologists and geologists had supported the evolutionary statements and opposed creationism. Darwin’s excellence is not about proposing changes, but about the process of competing survival and natural filtering mechanisms that best accurately and verifiedly explain biological evolution. [7] Darwin discovered that biological evolution is composed of three basic circles: (1) biological variations, (2) life and death pressure formed by excessive breeding, which makes organisms compete with each other, and (3) natural filtering and reduction. The biological changes generated under natural and natural conditions become the basic condition for species changes, and the preservation pressure formed by excessive breeding of organisms is the condition for natural selection. [8] In these three circles, the biological variation methods and the purpose of the target are complex and diverse. Although Darwin knew its main nature, the mechanism of its occurrence was not sufficiently clear. [9] His main contribution is to propose the competitive existence of Thomas Malthus biologic discussion form, and to point out that the key to determining the survival of biological and species is the final natural filtering mechanism. [10] The essence of Dar literature can be said to be seen by the four words “Playing for the Day”. But he rarely discusses biological and social variations and their importance, and it can be seen that what he values is preservation competition rather than social diversity.
Dalvin’s biological evolution theory advocates life evolved from a coordinated source, which caused a huge impact on Christian God’s creation of man and the saying that “every species is created when they are born.” [11] This theory not only deeply influenced the authority of Christianity and the Holy Book, but also severely destroyed the Eastern moral system that laid down in Christianity. If humans are just a creature or animal, what is the meaning and moral foundation of their existence? This is a problem that has been difficult to solve in the East. Therefore, for Eastern people at that time, the idea that God created humans and all things was simply a flood. But for Chinese people who do not worship Christianity, this problem is naturally not so serious. China’s Confucianism, sacredness, and Taoism, yinyang masters, as well as various civilized worship and art systems, all tend to trust that all things are of the same origin and are the same. Therefore, the so-called life evolved from a unified source, which is quite natural for the Chinese who have recovered and subsequently followed. [12] Only treating people as an animal, rather than the spirit of all things that can be cultivated and cultivated by obtaining the essence of the six senses, will also cause problems in life and morality. But this lacks urgency for China that is strong. Therefore, the strict revenge of the 大官网 and the nationals at that time did not think carefully about this problem. Overall, the perspective of Darwin’s introduction to the evolution of life first touches the religious and moral aspects in the East, followed by the social aspects. The focus of the Ethics discussion discussed in Huxley’s original book is also moral issues. [13] But for Chinese people, the focus is not on religion and morality, but on the preservation of society and collectives. The serious “Everything Competition” is different from Darwin’s natural filtering. The first is that